Strategy
Find the work that is genuinely ambiguous—and stop paying a model to do the rest.

The work
Find the work that is genuinely ambiguous—and stop paying a model to do the rest.
Make policy explicit, version-controlled, and inspectable before inference has a chance to drift.
Build the routing, local infrastructure, and deterministic tools the workflow actually needs.
The cost spectrum
Move predictable work out of inference. We map what needs a frontier model, what can run locally, and what should be code.
Useful for difficult reasoning and broad model capability; per-call costs, output variability, and data handling need deliberate controls.
Can keep model execution close to your data and model version under your control. Hardware, operations, and performance depend on the workload.
Known rules, repeatable outputs, no model inference. Code can be inspected, tested, and versioned.
Controls are configured for your requirements.
Results
Examples from engagements where routing, deterministic code, and appropriately sized models replaced blanket frontier inference.

CrowdTamers: an audit found much of the spend was structured formatting and routing work that could be expressed as deterministic code. The engagement also reported +30% top-line revenue.
greenchemistry.ai: converting deterministic data transformation from frontier inference to Python reduced a run from $5.00 to under $0.005.
A text-detection company moved classification to a smaller local model, reporting higher accuracy and lower latency alongside lower API spend.
A practical route
Measure before changing the architecture; put an explicit plan in front of implementation.
We map every AI call in your workflows, measure what each one costs, and score each task on a determinism scale.
We present what moves to deterministic code, what moves to a local model, and what stays on a frontier model—and why. You see before/after cost before implementation.
We implement the new workflows on infrastructure you control. A third-party API remains only where it genuinely has to.

WISDOM OF THE CROWDS
These are attributed public posts, not customer reviews or endorsements. They provide independent commentary on routing, controls, and deterministic work.
Most people building AI agents obsess over which model to use. The model is the easy part. Routing is what actually kills you in production.Read original post ↗
The worst agentic systems I've seen have one thing in common: they use an LLM for everything. Date parsing. Math. Format validation. Lookups. Transformations.Read original post ↗
Let the LLM do what it's good at — reasoning, pattern recognition, extraction. But when it comes to the governance decision — that decision gets made by explicit, version-controlled, inspectable code.Read original post ↗
“Not everything needs an LLM. Sometimes the boring solution is the profitable one.”Read original post ↗
“Prompts get you the demo. The harness gets you through month two.”Read original post ↗
“The best way to enforce rules is with external tools that communicate failure to the AI.”Read original post ↗
It's transformational for back office, for rote tasks, for boring, for B2B — data cleansing, swivel chair processes.Read original post ↗
“For anything specific and numerical it will always be cheaper and more reliable to just write normal deterministic software.”Read original post ↗
Public posts reproduced with attribution. Links lead to the original posts; they are commentary, not endorsements.
Start with the bill
If the bill is at that level, there is likely meaningful waste to find. The audit is free.